Current:Home > ScamsNorth Carolina’s highest court won’t fast-track appeals in governor’s lawsuits -FinanceMind
North Carolina’s highest court won’t fast-track appeals in governor’s lawsuits
View
Date:2025-04-16 12:49:36
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina’s highest court has decided it won’t fast-track appeals of results in two lawsuits initiated by Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper that challenged new laws that eroded his power to choose members of several boards and commissions.
The state Supreme Court, in orders released Friday, denied the requests from Republican legislative leaders sued by Cooper to hear the cases without waiting for the intermediate-level Court of Appeals to consider and rule first on arguments. The one-sentence rulings don’t say how individual justices came down on the petitions seeking to bypass the cases to the Supreme Court. Cooper’s lawyers had asked the court not to grant the requests.
The decisions could lengthen the process that leads to final rulings on whether the board alterations enacted by the GOP-controlled General Assembly in late 2023 over Cooper’s vetoes are permitted or prevented by the state constitution. The state Supreme Court may want to review the cases even after the Court of Appeals weighs in. No dates have been set for oral arguments at the Court of Appeals, and briefs are still being filed.
One lawsuit challenges a law that transfers the governor’s powers to choose state and local election board members to the General Assembly and its leaders. A three-judge panel of trial lawyers in March struck down election board changes, saying they interfere with a governor’s ability to ensure elections and voting laws are “faithfully executed.”
The election board changes, which were blocked, were supposed to have taken place last January. That has meant the current election board system has remained in place — the governor chooses all five state board members, for example, with Democrats holding three of them.
Even before Friday’s rulings, the legal process made it highly unlikely the amended board composition passed by Republicans would have been implemented this election cycle in the presidential battleground state. Still, Cooper’s lawyers wrote the state Supreme Court saying that bypassing the Court of Appeals risked “substantial harm to the ongoing administration of the 2024 elections.”
In the other lawsuit, Cooper sued to block the composition of several boards and commissions, saying each prevented him from having enough control to carry out state laws. While a separate three-judge panel blocked new membership formats for two state boards that approve transportation policy and spending and select economic incentive recipients, the new makeup of five other commissions remained intact.
Also Friday, a majority of justices rejected Cooper’s requests that Associate Justice Phil Berger Jr. be recused from participating in hearing the two cases. Cooper cited that the judge’s father is Senate leader Phil Berger, who is a defendant in both lawsuits along with House Speaker Tim Moore. In June, the younger Berger, a registered Republican, asked the rest of the court to rule on the recusal motions, as the court allows.
A majority of justices — the other four registered Republicans — backed an order saying they didn’t believe the judicial conduct code barred Justice Berger’s participation. The older Berger is a party in the litigation solely in his official capacity as Senate leader, and state law requires the person in Berger’s position to become a defendant in lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of state laws, the order said.
The court’s two registered Democrats — Associate Justices Allison Riggs and Anita Earls — said that the younger Berger should have recused himself. In dissenting opinions, Riggs wrote that the code’s plain language required his recusal because of their familial connection.
veryGood! (5221)
Related
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Trump’s Budget Could Have Chilling Effect on U.S. Clean Energy Leadership
- Puerto Rico Passes 100% Clean Energy Bill. Will Natural Gas Imports Get in the Way?
- A Shantytown’s Warning About Climate Change and Poverty from Hurricane-Ravaged Bahamas
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Ezra Miller Makes Rare Public Appearance at The Flash Premiere After Controversies
- Residents Fight to Keep Composting From Getting Trashed in New York City’s Covid-19 Budget Cuts
- Kristin Davis Cried After Being Ridiculed Relentlessly Over Her Facial Fillers
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Why Tom Holland Says Zendaya Had a Lot to Put Up With Amid His Latest Career Venture
Ranking
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- A Clean Energy Revolution Is Rising in the Midwest, with Utilities in the Vanguard
- Unsealed parts of affidavit used to justify Mar-a-Lago search shed new light on Trump documents probe
- How 12 Communities Are Fighting Climate Change and What’s Standing in Their Way
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Pentagon to tighten oversight of handling classified information in wake of leaks
- Hailey Bieber Supports Selena Gomez Amid Message on “Hateful” Comments
- Energy Execs’ Tone on Climate Changing, But They Still See a Long Fossil Future
Recommendation
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Naomi Watts Marries Billy Crudup: See the Couple's Adorable Wedding Photo
From Pose to Queer as Folk, Here Are Best LGBTQ+ Shows of All Time
In Louisiana, Stepping onto Oil and Gas Industry Land May Soon Get You 3 Years or More in Prison
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
Fossil Fuels on Trial: Where the Major Climate Change Lawsuits Stand Today
The Sounds That Trigger Trauma
JoJo Siwa Details How Social Media Made Her Coming Out Journey Easier